Cultural Crisis

Some of humanity has discovered it, most have not. It would be too arrogant to say that most have therefore slept through the hour, because they are just busy making it all run or simply surviving. A good many have noticed that reality has become unstable and is behaving strangely. But they don’t really have a word for it and have not yet come to the conclusion that we are now in deep cultural crisis. An ingrained culture with ingrown nails is in decay. The house of civilization is in disrepair, the plaster has peeled off the walls, the lintels are full of shit, there are constant power outages and starting holes in the roof. We have slowly gotten used to it, it’s just the times, old friend …

Which times? The question should of course be up-front: Is it the culture as such that is in crisis, or is it an overlay or an infection of this culture that is now having its decisive crisis? It can be difficult to separate a parasite from its host animal. The house of civilization is like a property run by a housing shark, where the residents have to fight against wear and tear, pay sky-high rents, while the owner drives around in a Jaguar in his tax haven somewhere abroad. It doesn’t take a lot of financial acumen to realize that the property is no longer financially sound. The values disappear … somewhere.

The cultural crisis is a knowledge crisis, but first and foremost it is an ethical crisis. A culture in decline is an entire set of values in decline. When a majority of a population meets corruption with applause, when they cheer for genocide, when they can barely get enough of the cynicism and fraud of the pharmaceutical industry, when they bow their heads to neo-totalitarianism, when they swallow lies on various flat screens – then we have accumulated a crisis that is deep-seated. And if unreserved love-cheer-clap is not the proper term, then we can modify it to tacit apathy, but at the same time we must note that he who is silent consents. We have approved the collapse of the culture that our ancestors fought with their lives to build, because we have not moved a finger to defend it.

Well, we could not think of applauding genocide, or what was it that you just said?

Are we a peaceful people when we are too stupid, lazy and cannot figure out how to speak out against our country’s participation in one war after another against nations that we as a nation or people have NEVER had a dispute with – simply because the world’s great bully the USA has ordered yet another attack on yet another people somewhere in the peripheral world? And it is not even the peripheral world when we as Europeans are talking about Serbia 30 years ago and Ukraine recently. There are only 1000 kilometers to Ukraine, and both Ukraine and Serbia were countries in Europe!

It is apparently without costs and consequences for us as a country’s population to participate in this kind of filth. It does not rain bombs on us, as it has done for the population of Donbas, who were massacred by the fascist government in Kiev. The people haven’t even figured out that they’ve been cheering on fascists and sending them festive fireworks for a lot of tax money, because NATO’s media apparatus has removed the term from the brown sewage stream of war propaganda that people have consumed along with potatoes with brown gravy… I mean pasta with meat sauce, because that’s what the curling kids were screaming about.

A population that is unwilling to speak out against the war has not earned peace. The war in Ukraine is in many ways symptomatic of the cultural crisis. The number of able-bodied men in Ukraine is now so low that it is noted in a new report from the Pentagon. The report mentions that one either has to give up and declare the proxy war against Russia lost or send NATO troops from the West over there so they can wade over the corpses.
From now on, it will no longer be without consequences to participate.

Here one could ask with fresh, albeit flimsy hope, whether the new generation would not be able to demonstrate the audacity of youth and speak out against the old warmongering assholes who have thrown their lives and all of ours into disarray. Here one is unfortunately badly disappointed. And let’s put it up-front: How could it do that when the older generations have neglected to give them a role model? But Gen Z has their very special contribution to the cultural crisis. They have chosen, as they say in foreign countries, to double-down. Or rather: they have been led to do so, and they have been targeted via a very special timing.

Gen Z

Gen Z – the curling kids – are now being viewed and discussed in companies as a real problem they need to deal with. Companies are therefore speculating on strategies to retain and use them in the recognition of this problem, which is not just one problem but many:

they don’t bother to show up for work (are you not in today?) if they can avoid it
they are not loyal to a workplace and change jobs when THEY have gotten what they were after, so companies suffer from a chronic loss of knowledge
they see THEMSELVES as the focal point and not the work that needs to be done
they don’t bother to learn the traditions, routines or history that exist in a workplace and the profession they believe they master (which they rarely do)
experience / seniority does not count for them, because youth is proclaimed to be a quality in itself

But companies have an even bigger problem, which is that they believe that they can make Gen Z compliant through strategies and flattery. They can’t. The only way forward for companies will be to recognize that a significant portion of Gen Z is fundamentally fucked-up and then to announce it. So: Now listen here, young man/woman, if you want to work here, the conditions are as follows … and then test them on their attitude and value set. If they don’t match, they are a bad investment for the company, followed by a polite rejection with a note to come back when they have solved their attitude problem.

We are of course talking about a degree of fucked-upness, because not everyone in a generation is a blatant narcissistic-sociopathic, far from it. But everyone in any given generation has an element of the basic attitude of the entire generation, and it does not simply disappear over time in the face of reality. Especially not if ‘reality’ desperately tries to adapt to the sociopathy and does not say no.

It is important to understand that Gen Z can never be held primarily responsible for the misery. They did not ask for it, just as no generation asked for the slipstream in which it grows up. You could say that they have subsequently taken on the misery and that they identify with the state of things, but they do not know what they identify with. They do not take responsibility. They just think it tastes good, so they want more on their plate without understanding what awaits them and all of us: A stomachache in a moment. They were the ones who screwed their heads off en masse and jumped on the wokeness bandwagon because they thought they had understood something about the world situation. The only thing they understood was that they were welcome to reproduce what their brainwashed teachers and other ideological inputs had stuffed into their heads, but not what it was for and especially not that it was all a big designer lie intended for cultural destruction. In other words, the part of the culture that had not yet been fully brought into crisis. And that is what it became. They became agents of an agenda they neither related to nor understood, and they got absolutely no help from anywhere.

Gen Z is a distillate. The process started with the baby boomers/68ers, the most spoiled generation of the time. It is their grandchildren and now their great-grandchildren who are the distillate. They have completed what the 68ers started and wanted for themselves. And now that the old people are seeing their wishes come true, they don’t care what they wanted, but the 68ers are now retirees, and nobody listens to them anymore, because retirees and old people are considered trash.

But hey, isn’t Gen Z also considered trash by the machine? How else could we allow an entire generation to more or less go down the drain just so that someone out there could make it all fall apart?

You could say that the 68ers were already exposed to the same kind of cultural attack that was resumed and upgraded recently. They too were not aware that all the glory was not for their sake, even though it tasted good at the time. Those were the great times when they could go crazy for decades of their lives and still get the cool job afterwards. And those who didn’t want the cool job – because you could get plenty of jobs without education back then – learned to maneuver in the system, and if it didn’t work out, or they just didn’t want to make it work, they learned to live on welfare for years. They called themselves cultural radicals or socialists, but after just a decade in the pinball machine it turned out that their slogans were very loosely attached – and slowly fell off. Their imagination and self-absorption were great, their authenticity was not so great.

Personally, I wouldn’t want to be in Gen Z’s shoes. They are up against some formidable forces. They have been run flat by a social media steamroller. The advertising and entertainment industries have pumped them full of falsehood. Their educations are the culmination of a process of constant deterioration. Their social circle is swimming in designer drugs, booze, porn and bad fast food. Their language has become so street-smartly blunted that it can’t handle any reality other than flickering. As grown-up people, some of us have at least some resilience through life experience, we don’t (necessarily) buy into all the crap that comes out of the machine. As a young person today, you have no knowledge whatsoever that enables you to stand up against it. Ask a 20-year-old kid or girl what World War I was about, and they wouldn’t know. Ask them whether the European Commission is a democratic institution, and they would have no idea or just say: yes there is a parliament. The right answer is: no the EU Parliament has no power, the EU Commission has all power (and you don’t have to be young to be ingnorant of that). They are the historyless generation, floating freely in a neutralized zone of airiness, drifting like a ship without an anchor. Those who manage to get grounded deserve a round of applause for heroism. The rest deserve no contempt, but empathy – plus a friendly nod with a cart pole that we all have a problem, so get your fingers out of the social channel while we remember to give ourselves a kick in the behind.

Designer crisis

The crisis is not the result of a series of random slips in a nebulous chain of unguarded moments. It is consciousness formation by design. The crisis is the result of a calculated plan for the termination of Western culture + fringe culture culminating in our time = the third decade of the third millennium with the globalist world order. This order could no longer be described as a culture, because culture implies something that is cultivated, that grows and bears fruit, and that the cultivating civilization harvests and sows again. Culture itself is a cyclical, life-promoting process. The goal of the project was the eradication of culture as a common-human concern and the introduction of a corporatist-centralist-globalist technocratic pseudo-culture, where people were the cultivated vegetables and cattle behind bars. How many here would describe a prison or a pig farm as a cultural institution, hands up! The machine was heading towards anti-culture, and someone had decided on everyone’s behalf that this was the path we should take.

Culture is history in progression. It is no coincidence that one of the ideologists of globalism, Francis Fukuyama, announced The End of History and the Last of Man. He was actually talking about the end of culture, and like the Marxists, he believed that it was all deterministic. History was a machine, and people were just nuts and cogs in the machine. Here we must understand that the philosophers/ideologists of premodernism, modernism and postmodernism like Fukuyama did not prophesy, even though they presented themselves as such. They were not visionaries who, with their sensitivity, sensed the rustling of history and updated it into the future. The possibly last philosopher to do so was Nietzsche. After this, the philosophers began to be enrolled in the future machine designed to terminate culture. Spengler announces the Doom of the West (Untergang des Abendlandes), just as Fukuyama announced the doom of history. The Fabian Socialists announced the slow slide towards slave society (Bernard Shaw, H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russell, the Huxley brothers). The Frankfurt School (Lukacs, Horkheimer, Adorno, Habermas, Benjamin, Marcuse) discreetly admitted that their main goal was the destruction of Western civilization (the university cultural Marxists are reluctant to admit it, because it sounds too uncharming – which it is!), and the World Economic Forum admits it bluntly in their own arrogant way.

The remaining real visionary philosophers like Alexandr Dugin are systematically character assassinated when they do not sing along with the designer chorus. The design is for a unipolar world order with ultra-centralism, and Dugin sticks a deadly analytical ice pick into the design as sharp as the thing that killed Trotsky in Mexico, which the globalists absolutely do not like.

When charity turns deadly

One of the favorite pastimes of the culture and value destroyers is to corrupt and pervert charity. They consider it their greatest victory to get a hit on any form of goodness.

Attacks on the child, the most innocent being among humans, are therefore a major concern. It has just emerged that one of the Danish so-called charitable and child-care organizations called Børns Vilkår (Childrens Conditions) is now promoting that children up to the age of six should be able to have legal gender reassignment surgery! Just say that piece of inflammatory newspeak a few times to yourself … legal gender reassignment surgery, let it sink in.

This means that Cultural Marxism version 2.0 has now infiltrated Børns Vilkår with wokeness, transhumanism and LGBTQ’ism, which in turn means that the conditions of children are now completely fucked-up. So, Børns Vilkår has now joined the dirty club of pedophiles, child traffickers and organ traffickers. Shame on them, and let their filth stick to them for time and eternity!

This is just a single local example of the lethality.
The list of so-called humanitarian or charitable organizations that have allowed themselves to be corrupted is frightening – here is just a microscopic selection of different observances:

International Red Cross
Amnesty International
Greenpeace
WWF (World Wild Life Foundation)
The UN and all its sub-chapters
The Catholic Church
Fundamentalist Islam
Secular pseudo-Judaism

Add to that a global army of 1000s of George Soros-founded NGO groups commissioned to promote regime change, The Clinton Foundation, state development organizations such as Danish Danida or Mellemfolkelig Samvirke. We only need to show the UN’s frightening statistics on the implementation of development aid projects: only a mere 1.3% of all donated funds from member states reach their goals, and the rest goes to … administration = corruption. And that 1.3% is also wasted, as all UN projects fall apart within a few years. Conclusion: The UN is a fraudulent organization designed for money laundering. And in eg. the African countries it is even worse. UN groups are directly linked to human- and child trafficking.

There is a pattern when you look closely at international organizations:

Peace organizations turn out to be conflict and war-promoting, which means that all peace negotiations on the international stage are doomed plays.
Health organizations turn out to be tools for the pharmaceutical industry, which means that they are disease-promoting.
Political organizations are plays, which means that the population is extras in a circus of fraud designed to passivize, dumb down and subjugate.
Scientific organizations turn out to be tools for the patent mafia, which means that all real scientific progress ends up in the industry’s remote warehouse and scrapyard.
Media organizations turn out to be propaganda organs for the Global Deep State, which means that everything that comes from there is a lie from start to finish.
Financial institutions turn out to be criminal financial tools, which means that their main purpose is to rob humanity.

It almost doesn’t matter what field of knowledge, what type of organization or institution one dives into, and it turns out to be infected with parasites whose very existence contradicts the organization’s or institution’s stated purpose. This is the omnipresent lethality that always seeks charity as its home.

Live <> Evil

Let us study for a moment an interesting combination of four letters.

Evil always seeks life alive, because it cannot exist without being supplied with life and life energy. It cannot generate it from within. Evil is dead on a permanent respirator.
It is nothing in itself. Only by destroying life can evil unfold.
Another combination of the letters is veil.
Evil veils itself. It cannot operate in broad daylight, because then it would arouse too much disgust. It calls itself something else, it pretends to be good.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Another combination is viel, which is the meat of a young cattle.
Evil loves young meat – speaking of the conditions of children.
The compound vile means wild-and-bloody
And then there is the compound levi, which is interesting in a crude way in light of a certain genocide in the Middle East these days.

The last combination in the series of anagrams is particularly strange – and problematic. The left seems to have rediscovered a cause that reminds them of what they were in their heyday – that is, 50 years ago, when they still possessed some kind of critical sense. It is now politically left-wing correct to criticize Israel’s genocide in Gaza, which is indeed highly reprehensible and immensely repulsive. It is a disgrace for all of humanity to witness. So the left, which has been desperately lacking a cause to advocate for, one that had meat on its back and bones to walk on, is opportunistically pouncing on this cause. Here comes the problem: They cannot manage the cause, because they do not know what it is about. The only thing they are capable of as reactionary-emotional types is to react. They do not reflect, they react. They have no idea what they are for, only what they are against. They have nothing to propose, nothing to put in its place, no vision of something better. They have no understanding of the deeper political game that is going on, because a left-wing brain is polluted by the falsification of history and synthetic explanations of the world that confuse the map with the landscape.

Don’t be evil – said Google in their early days.
Why did they say that? Why did they think it was necessary to say that?
They revealed in their eagerness to assure the world in advance that they did not have evil intentions, that … they did!

The system or anti-culture that is now collapsing and creating a cultural crisis is built on the principle of evil. Evil could pay off at any time, in any place and in any way, because it was fully integrated into the business model. The only requirement for implementation was that evil was never mentioned.

The next thought must therefore necessarily be whether the cultural crisis itself is evil?
It is the principle of evil that is in critical decline, and is it evil?
Nothing is so evil that it is not good for something.

It is a somewhat more abstract mindset to try to understand how something that looks like the beginning of total chaos can be life-enhancing. It is also a dangerous mindset, because it can very easily be confused with revolutionary romanticism. Aah, the taste of gunpowder, blood and burning cities, doesn’t it make your teeth water? Are we now getting completely wet in our underwear with revolutionary passion?

China is currently in the midst of its own cultural crisis. They had the Cultural Revolution, the great genocide of the great helmsman. Let me venture to formulate a main principle for the sustainability of such a designer civilization. If, like communist China, you are created on the mass murder of your own population, you only have so much time on earth. Such hubris has already given birth to its nemesis, such an empire has a built-in countdown to its own downfall. That the Global Deep State had planned for China to be the new center and fully implemented between 2020-30 is another matter. Unfortunately, it shows how the left-wing brain is helplessly enlisted as controlled opposition in the globalists’ 100-year plan for the 1000-year empire.

Democracy crisis

The cultural transition is the rediscovery and renewal of culture.
Doesn’t invention mean looking deep down in the basement, finding a golden treasure and pulling it up into the light? There is nothing new under the sun, everything is rediscovery. Party and bloc politics, whistle-blowing and brain-splitting political ideologies have no place in the cultural rediscovery. This applies to the right as well as the left. In the United States, the right wing has run completely dead on their one-eyed Trump machine. Lately i 2025 is has become utterly absurd, almost beyond words. The left wing completely sold out of their last legacy by creating an Anti-Trump machine. The were told to hate Trump but for all the wrong reasons, which disqualified them. Both wings bet everything on their one horse, so when it finally comes out that the man died in January 2021 and that they have hired an actor to play the role, the rug is completely pulled from under everything they have been doing, and people will start asking if there might be other dead presidents in the spotlight (and there are).

This wing mentality, which had taken root in parliamentary culture for centuries, originated in the French Revolution and was later spread as the schism between the Soviet Empire and the Western Empire that created the Cold War. This war was cold because it meant a freezing of fronts – not only territorially but deep into the attitude and opinion set of humanity. We believed in the front and the wing mentality, we believed that democracy consisted of the eternal tennis game between right and left, conservative and liberal. We did not understand that it was all a ping-pong theatrical sport, where the voters’ patience was worn out by one wing, which made way for the other wing, which then wore out the voters’ patience, after which …

We did not understand the dialectic of thesis-antithesis-synthesis, problem-reaction-offered-solution.
We did not understand that we were offered and promised help by our worst enemies.
We did not understand that security policy was a guarantee of insecurity.
We didn’t understand that we lived in a constant state of martial law on a low flame, which could be turned up at any time.
We didn’t understand that right-left was an installation to maintain a division between people = a constant disagreement designed to weaken our power of action and decision-making. It was like a piece of lobotomy designed to sever the connection between the right and left hemispheres of the brain.

Political polarization and left-right wing nonsens makes us dumber and dumber.
We have become culturally and mentally bipolar disordered.

The rediscovery of culture involves a re-establishment of the basic idea behind parliament, EVERYTHING. It consists of conversation and not mudslinging, character assassination or blunt symbolic political cliché statements designed to silence dissent. The conversation is intended for the common good, the common well-being – not for running people over with a steamroller and ensuring that they are kept out of influence. It includes contradictions, it does not reinforce them.

The conversation is intended to bring all knowledge, all opinions and all interests to things, i.e. All THINGS, hence the name, the discussion and decision-making forum of all things. The mechanism of division of representative democracies has ensured that sustainable solutions never took place, because a component from those who were kept out of the forum of influence was always missing. The compromised country of half-truths has no future.

What do I mean by the missing component?

In the worldview of evil and division, there was conservatism and progressivism.
You were either a supporter of one or the other.
If you were progressive, you hated conservatives.
If you were conservative, progressives were your enemies.
Progressives advocated the destruction of the status quo.
The status quo refused to renew their rigid mindsets.

A healthy company

Let’s use the company as an example to understand why this schismatic and blunt political reality model has completely failed. Many companies have actually not understood this because the management culture has cultivated the same destructive mindset and because they wanted to appear smart and ahead of the curve. There is SO much newspeak in the management lingo! And I know, what I am talking about having spent 20 years listening to it.

At some point in a company’s history, perhaps at several points, there is a need for renewal. Many companies are built on just such renewal, which has created their success from the beginning. They came up with something that was new and made a name for themselves on it.

Once this renewal has taken place, there is no need to renew the renewal. There is a need for consolidation. There is a need to hold on to and expand on what created the success via the original renewal or the renewal that was introduced at a later time to keep up with the development. It is time to preserve = conserve.

What is often seen in companies is that the creative clique pushes forward and promotes their excellence because they refuse to let go. To the simple question: If something works, why change it? their answer is: Because innovation is a quality in itself – a statement and an attitude as ridiculously outdated as: youth is a qualification in itself, or we are so-and-so progressive, because progress is always good … when progress is heading towards the abyss?

At this point, it is necessary to tell the innovators, the creative class, the revolutionaries that they must either find another job or conform to the consolidation of the company. We have some work for you until we need your special skills again, if you will be so kind. New employees, who often arrive with the energy of innovation, must learn the company’s traditions = the transmission of accumulated knowledge.

Tradition = experiments that work.

Transferred to the parliamentary institution, it would be the equivalent of a war in the company between the innovators and the preservers. If the innovators won, it would be a bang or a fall. Either the company was broken into atoms and sunk, or a new success was created on top of a smoking pile of ruins. But there was no guarantee of the latter, because it was a gamble where the baby was probably thrown out with the bathwater. If the preservers won, the company was assured of success here and now and in the long term, but in the future there would be no guarantees, and at some point it could run out of steam. By fighting each other, the company became an unstable project with an unbalanced conflict between stagnation and explosion.

If the company – and in the analogy of the example, the government of society had been inclusive and recognized that a balance between the preserving and the innovative element is necessary for a company and a society’s well-being, then we would have been in a completely different place as a starting point.

Well, isn’t this common sense?

As a wise person said (it wasn’t me), unfortunately, common sense is not as common as one would think. There were stronger forces at work that worked 24/7/365 for decades and half centuries to destroy common sense. These forces knew that it was necessary to sabotage common sense in order to destroy the common good. If the ‘good’ was to be reserved for themselves = the absolute few and not the common = the many, then it was necessary for the many to be unable to think, feel and act. They had to be rendered incapacitated so that they were no longer able to defend themselves and their well-being. In fact, people had to beg and plead to be allowed to destroy their own living conditions and well-being.

People had to be stressed to such an extent that they had no energy to demand well-being. One of the particularly stressful things is to constantly change things, so that every time a new routine was incorporated, you had to completely change it, because now there had to be renewal. Ask elementary school teachers in Denmark how stressful it is for them to constantly get a new elementary school law. Their workplace has become a political battlefield, a power project. The result is stressed, worn-out teachers, reactive students and parents who, from the sidelines, have no idea what to think, after which they also react and blame the teachers for everything.

Why this manic obsession with renewal – for the sake of renewal itself?

We are ignoring cases of much-needed renewal here.
There is only one explanation: the signal value. It is symbolic politics and self-promotion.
Politicians and business leaders show their power by focusing on renewal.
It is virtue signaling – have you all seen how good we are?
It is a show-off of determination, action ability, competence – but for no other reason than show-off.

They want nothing more from the renewal than to get attention.
These are actions in the same category as crying on purpose or acting like a drama queen.

The baby dummy

When the many were robbed/deprived of their well-being, they were given a dummy called democracy.
The democratic state deludes its population that it is the people who rule.
Popular rule means that the people rule, doesn’t it? But the ruling forces in the backroom had a different understanding of the concept of popular rule, and for them it meant that the people WERE ruled.
The basic idea of democracy sounds fine on paper. Especially if there are built-in elements of the republic that can ensure that the majority doesn’t go crazy against the minority.

But democracy is difficult if everyone is to be heard. In fact, it doesn’t work on a larger scale, as it did for those who invented it. And no, it wasn’t a few Greek city-states, it was the Norsemen long before them. It worked because it was manageable, and because everyone knew everyone. The Althingi couldn’t be put down, because then you would get everyone on your back. If Socrates had lived with an Althingi people’s government, he would not have been executed as a scoundrel for teaching the youth of Athens critical thinking. On the other hand, there would have been no reason to be a scoundrel, because there was no corrupt upper class in Althingi country.

So, the troublesome democracy came under scrutiny, and the non-popular power saw that it could be corrupted and circumvented. Extra-parliamentarism ate its way deep into democracy. We got what we call The Deep State today. They sit in their lodges and clubs and make the decisions away from the spotlight. Tell me, isn’t that what we call conspiring? That is, the c-word that we are not allowed to use. Could there be a special reason why we are not allowed to use it? I mean, according to the laws of democracy, it is considered a crime that is punishable. But as far as I know, there have been no cases in recent times for conspiracy, so it is obviously outdated, or what?

The cultural crisis is therefore also the crisis of democracy. Democracy has reached its expiration date, which is well past its sell-by date. Check out parliamentarism in England and the US, it stinks. The US has no actual government at all anymore, they only have the Deep State Mafia. Or check out how fascistically Canada, Australia and New Zealand behaved during Operation Lockdown. 70% of the French believe that their politicians are corrupt. The Dutch and Belgians are furious with the sick government that is destroying agriculture. The German government is currently destroying Germany as a leading industrial country and has dismantled the energy supply that is the prerequisite for that – to lick the anus of the Americans and their Ukrainian proxy war against Russia. The Danish government has completely stopped listening to anyone other than their own spin doctors.

The Empire sold the sacred democracy, just as the Roman Empire sold the sacred state cult called Christianity with violence and force. Empire 2.0, like the Roman Empire, went to war to impose the democratic model on the whole world. Only a few asked themselves why the Empire had to enforce democracy worldwide with violence and force, if it was such an obvious good idea? Just like with Christianity, because if it was so obviously benevolent and benign, why was it so necessary to destroy all human societies in its path?
Why these mass beheadings of heathens?
And why even call them heathens = people belonging to the past?
Or pagans (eng.), which translated means peasant asses!

Did Christianity as a Roman state cult respect man?
And did democracy as a forced system of government respect the people?
The answer is in both cases a clear NO!

Here we are talking about an imposed belief and system of government. When the USA invades a nation under the pretext of wanting to help the poor population against their evil dictator, it is a case of double hypocrisy. Firstly, the USA has probably already installed the evil dictator itself. Secondly, their imposed democracy is not worth five pots of piss, because it covers up a hidden agenda: plundering the country’s resources. Often they don’t even bother to hide the agenda. England in the past and France since have also been big bad, but at least they didn’t pretend that they came to save the country, they were far too arrogant for that. To stage a coup d’état and then call it democratic rule must be the highest degree of hypocrisy imaginable. They came to plunder – period. Afterwards they could eventually come up with further rationalizations. You can hear Englishmen who can seriously say that if the British colonial power had not been there everywhere, then people over there would still be living in ancient times … and the Darwinists’ white man’s burden and all that jazz. The French are so arrogant that they don’t even bother to rationalize, they just say merde! , while they are now being thrown out of the Sahel region in Africa – Vraiment, il était about fucking temps!

Democracy is far more insidious than dictatorship. And NB! this statement is in no way a defense of tyranny. Plato already stated that democracy was the second worst form of government, precisely because it was a form of tyranny with a chocolate coating. He saw with his own eyes how murderous Athenian democracy was. It was nothing more than a lynch mob, because the majority exercised tyranny over the minority and executed their best minds. Democracy is corruptible, manipulable and for sale for paltry mammon. It is a machine where it is inconsequential to run away from all promises – for the next four years, after which you can just sit and collect a big salary as a controlled reactionary opposition in waiting position. All the important decisions are made outside parliament, and today it is done by telling the heads of state to dance tango – which they do. Play Gypsy, or I’ll piss on your violin! And then the tango dancers are welcome to let parliament parlér and pretend afterwards that it was they who came up with the idea of … committing self-harm, because it was such a good idea, and people must be able to understand that, since we say that it is for their own good, and we could never say anything that was not appropriate.

Which is not right. We saw how easy it was to kill the last spark of democracy during Operation Lockdown. At the same time, the government ensured that a piece of legislation was left hanging as a backdrop that would make it easy for them the next time they were told to shut down. So if we were to remove the thin tablecloth on the table, fascism would be burned into the tabletop. The Pandemic Act came as the icing on the cake following the manipulated Public Information Act, the Terrorism Act and the Influence Act. All four pieces of legislation combined with NATO membership, EU membership and UN membership have given up all sovereignty and abolished democracy in Denmark – without it being announced to the public. If they had announced it, even the stupid-lazy Danes would have signed off. All four pieces of legislation are completely unnecessary, because all the laws regarding this already exist. The were installed for ‘something else’.

In fact, it was announced, but it was like a slander from the Minister of Justice in the Frederiksen government, who boldly said in the middle of the lockdown: People go around thinking they have civil rights – they don’t, do they? And thank you for the announcement, Mr. Minister, you will be quoted for that for the rest of your days. It was during the same period that the Prime Minister stated: There will be no room in this country in the future for people who are not vaccinated. That will also be remembered. For eternity.

Have we learned anything at all?

When those in power have become so arrogant that they can stand up completely shamelessly and brag about their totalitarian worldview, then the crisis has unfolded.
Here is an equally arrogant trend in the management world that states:
Never let a good crisis go to waste.
What is meant by that?

We can of course take off our critical glasses completely and just ask the very smart management people who spit out the sentence: Well, a crisis must mean that we have to turn up our innovative power and get together, yes, that’s what we mean.

Well, yes. We should probably rather move into the genre called chaos capitalism or crisis capitalism. First of all, they have now once again misused the concept of capitalism to mean something other than what it means: Everyone’s right to trade with others without interference from either authorities or envious competitors. In other words, fair trade in the true sense of the word. These people create crises themselves to profit from them. They monopolize and manipulate, so that the so-called free market, which is the very core of a capitalist system, has completely disappeared. These are the same types who organize wars around the globe to make money from the destruction that is created. It costs a lot of money to rebuild, to buy weapons and personnel to destroy and weapons to defend against destroyers. This is also why socialists miss the mark when they throw around the word ‘capitalist’ as a curse word, because it is not capitalism at all that is being targeted, it is monopolization, mammonism or fascism – another word that they have not understood either. They have never experienced capitalism, because it had disappeared even before they opened their mouths. They have never experienced socialism either, because they have never lived under a socialist regime. And they have forgotten to ask the Eastern Europeans how that thing felt.

That this is not something we blame the chaos capitalists (monopoly casino capitalists) for, just because they are so unsympathetic, we know from well-known economists who brazenly state in their own media, Financial Times, Forbes, The Economist, etc., that a war would be good for the stagnant economy. Isn’t that exactly what is happening with hectic activity in the back rooms in connection with the Ukraine crisis? This whole absurd war is about money laundering, and the best location has been chosen to be Europe’s most corrupt regime – upgraded in corruption by a CIA coup. It is also about destroying Russia’s economy – AND, which is not talked about much in the media, but is certainly talked about in the corridors around European government buildings and in the boardrooms of companies: Destruction of the European national economies. That’s exactly what we’re witnessing, but the commentators in the media and the politicians don’t have the courage to say it out loud, because they all feel threatened from outside and from above and from within the shadowy land. So again money-money-money – and if you say it, you’ll be muzzled in these times of censorship.

The best and by now most well-documented example of a fake crisis is the 2008-09 financial crisis. One might ask oneself why it has not long since been on everyone’s lips and documented in history that it was a fraud and an inside job? This confirms that the concept of ‘not letting a crisis go to waste’ – because it apparently went completely to waste, and no one learned anything from it … apparently – that is, that the concept does not mean what we think. It did not go to waste, because the bankers shoveled tax money into their pockets in the form of bail-out rewards for their irresponsible, greedy financial adventures. There was enormous centralization. The housing market crashed and the properties bought up for a penny (pennies for a dollar). Small businesses closed down and were swallowed up by the globalist machine.

We learned nothing, because we never got to know what was really going on and who was pushing the buttons in the control room. The politicians learned nothing … well, they learned what they already knew: that they should just shut up and look the other way with a gun to the side of their head. Smile, you’re on! They learned once again to know their place in the service role for their clients. The media learned the same thing without learning anything. They just reported, as chance theorists, that it was all an accident that no one saw coming, and that we couldn’t have done anything about anyway, and that we had better pay the price as soon as possible, because otherwise it would probably be worse for ourselves. Too big to fail, too big to jail. Media and politicians sang sweet hymns in the same choir.

And what do we see in the next major staged crisis and Operation Lockdown? The same actors are once again on the scene. We see a new mega-centralization and shutdown of smaller businesses. This time, the mafiosos in slick suits in black Mercedes on their way to board meetings behind smoke-tinted windows had allied themselves with people in white coats. They had also pre-programmed spreadsheet types that were good at manipulating statistics. Of course, they had also pre-programmed the nice media uncles and aunties so that the poor guys with light blue muzzles wouldn’t have trouble with ‘wrong’ information along the way.

The people in the white coats represent a mega-industry that operates in the same way as the military industry. Without war – no industry, no profit. Without disease – no industry, no profit. It’s that simple. It’s so simple that people are unable to understand why there’s an elephant the size of a battle tank standing right in the middle of the room laughing at us.

In the 1970s we had an oil crisis. It was artificially staged by the oil producers.
Today we have an energy crisis. It was artificially staged by an unholy alliance of the USA, NATO, the EU, the war industry and the energy cartels.
Along the way we got a climate crisis – no comments this time …

Credibility crisis

Once again, the majority of the population learned nothing. Or did they?
I think there is a small piece of the wishful thinking in the back of many people’s minds.

There are reports of a lack of trust in politicians.
There are reports of a lack of trust in the media.
There are reports of a lack of trust in globalist power forums such as the World Economic Forum.
There are reports of a lack of trust in the pharmaceutical industry.

Are we actually learning our lesson now?
Perhaps the crisis is not doomed to be wasted this time.
However, there is a BUT, a big BUT.

Distrust in itself is only a beginning, albeit an important beginning.
We should definitely not trust those who have abused our trust so grossly and so many times.
It must definitely end, and we cannot pull the plug too quickly.
BUT if we don’t mobilize a piece of solid self-confidence as a substitute, then it’s all in vain.

The question is:
How can people become trustworthy towards themselves again?
We have actively participated by praising untrustworthiness and passively by looking the other way.
We have believed in the untrustworthy and have become co-addicts of untrustworthiness.
We cannot afford to let another crisis go to waste on OUR side of the field.
We have to conquer culture back as OUR CULTURE.

A dive 150 years into history reveals that such a global cultural conflict and crisis had already been laid down and projected in the second half of the 19th century. It was here that the infamous letter allegedly from the American Freemason chief Albert Pike to his Italian fellow-soul Giuseppe Mazzini was written. Here Pike describes how humanity is facing three world wars. When the letter appears many years later, the first two world wars have already ended and correspond quite closely to the description. In short, the first two world wars were intended for the existing empires/empires in Europe and the surrounding area to destroy each other. And so they did. The third world war is intended for the world religions to destroy each other. And as an added bonus according to Pike, people will finally clap their hands in disillusionment with joy when Lucifer steps forward and shows himself as the true god and ruler. Freemason nonsense? These people were the ones who created world history. Is it really nonsense? You and I can shake our heads at their sick, satanic mindset, but when this mindset is translated into bloody reality, it is no longer nonsense. These people take their own chronic mental illness very seriously, and it is their greatest joy that none of us understand the extent of the illness, because then they think they can continue unnoticed.

In 1996, the globalist and historian Samuel P. Huntington wrote his book The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order – with a foreword by Henry Kissinger, say no more. His scenario has unmistakable reminiscences of the Pike-Mazzini letter. This was the start of the WW3 scenario, the endgame, the great clash of civilizations.

Are people starting to get a feel for this dark undercurrent of black agenda?

There is only one way to regain self-confidence and self-esteem in a cultural era of denigration of human self-worth and self-respect.
It is to walk the talk.
Do what they say we are incapable of.
Prove that homo sapiens do not need the incubator state.
Go to the big tree in the park and hang your pacifier on a branch.
If you do not believe that you have the skills to be an entrepreneur in the spirit of the new culture, find out who does and give them your approving support.

A multipolar world

And what is the spirit of the new culture anyway? Can it be described?
In answer to that question, sociologist and philosopher Alexandr Dugin says:
It is The Fourth Political Theory, the name of his book of the same name. It differs from the three failed theories socialism, fascism and liberalism in that it has not yet been written. The three were written by the power and served to the people. The fourth cannot, by its very nature, be written in that way but must be formulated by the people themselves within the civilization to which it belongs. It can only be formulated in a multipolar world order.

So it can be described, it can be formulated, and it must be formulated.
But here we are playing the ball right into the right foot. We can no longer expect anyone to play it for us as in the representative consumer democracy, the couch vote-o-cracy, where we cast our vote (= we no longer have a vote, because we have put it in a ballot box so that it can be cremated) put a greasy cross on a long sandwich paper and then sink into the couch for another four years. We can no longer expect clear-sighted ideologues to come and serve us a ready-made TV dinner ready for the microwave. Bling! Taxpayer! I just formed an opinion.

It has to be binding to be dissatisfied with the state of things.
It requires a sacrifice – of convenience.
The nanny state is not standing in line with itself to fix our miseries.
On the other hand, we should not ask their permission to fix them either. We should just get started.

The Fourth Political Theory cannot, of course, be watered down to anything.
It is a contract project offered to all civilizations that are ready to restore their culture.
It cannot be dictated as political doctrines from a unipolar Empire, to which everyone has to dance tango.
It can only be formulated and approved based on each particular civilization/culture, its population and its living and life-giving traditions. Certain seemingly dead traditions can be revived to some extent, because many traditions have been subjected to killing through imperialism and colonialism. Or liberalism, because as Dugin says: The first two theories died, and when the third saw that it was alone left, it became totalitarian and took over the scraps of the other two as its own. We, too, in what we believe is the only civilized part of the world, are internally colonized and victims of imperialism.

If we are to conclude with optimism, the impulse for a multipolar world is so strong that it cannot be stopped any longer. They can try, but they will not succeed. It spreads like a faintly smoldering wildfire – which is, by the way, some self-contradictory nonsense, because a wind-blown wildfire runs fast, let’s try again: like a hollow tree trunk burning from the inside. It takes all night for it to turn into coal. OK, I’ll look for a better picture, but you get the point.

It’s hard to explain, but at first it will just feel like there is something in the air. We see it, then we see it often, then we see it everywhere. It doesn’t seem coherent, but maybe that’s just because we have learned never to demand connections, because then you are a #¥^∆!%& theorist. We are out of practice in understanding connections beyond the completely banal and obvious. Gradually, the new initiatives we are experiencing begin to seem coherent, and we begin to understand that they come from a common deep-seated impulse.

Personally, I am so optimistic that I am convinced that even with such widespread apathy in people, the impulse will be irresistible. Many will wake up and ask in their sleep: Where have I been for so long?
And then it may be that it is only something I imagine, because otherwise there are far too many excuses to be pessimistic. It will then turn out, and we will look at the culture in 10 years in the mirror if we live that long.

In the meantime, let’s do something about it – each with his own desire and abilities. It can only get better from here.