Muddermaskinen og den store labyrint

En del af pyramiderne – der er rigtig mange, og de er alle forskellige – i det nordlige Egypten = det lavere Egypten (Nilen løber som bekendt nedad) – er sammensunkne muddermaskiner.
Hvad mener jeg med det?

Lad os tage på en udflugt til Hawwara. Her ligger flere af disse mudder-murstens-konstruktioner. Vi gider ikke længere at spilde alt for meget argumentations-tid på egyptologerne, der har idømt dem ung alder og primitiv efterligning af de første dynastiers bygningskunst. De første dynastier byggede overhovedet ikke pyramider – de overtog dem. Og mudder-murstenene er kun primitive isoleret set. Som fænomen er de en del af et hi-tech-projekt.
For den store uddybende fremstilling læs: Et egyptisk-rumænsk rejsebrev

Hawara er interessant på flere måder. Man ankommer til stedet og ser mudderklumpen. Altså det er tydeligvis en pyramide, og på ydersiden ligger disse muddersten (eng.) ‘mud bricks’. I midten og bunden af muddermurstenene ligger et granitkammer i stil med Giza-pyramiderne og alle de andre. De indre kamre findes altid, de hårde materialer findes her, skallen er forskellig. Endog meget forskellig. Men i Hawara er det snarere det omliggende terræn, der er vækker interesse..

Rundt om mudder-pyramiden i Hawara ligger noget stort begravet under sandet og under en antik vandkanal, der skærer sig igennem stedet, der forhinder, at man kan gå ned i komplekset: et systemkompleks af rum og gange på 3000 kamre! ifølge beretninger fra antikken. Altså et grundareal på størrelse med 10 fodboldbaner i adskillige etager. Grækerne så dem, romerne så dem (og følte sig voldsomt provokerede af bedriften, som vidste, de ikke selv ville være i stand til at udføre), geofysiske scanninger viser dem tydeligt. De seneste viser, at der er adskillige lag, og at det muligvis kun er det øverste, der er beskadiget af overvandingskanalen.

Mudderkomplekset / pyramiden er opbygget som følger: et granitkammer i midten med en resonant stenkiste i centrum. Et lag af mudder som mursten som et isolerede lag til at aflede den voldsomme energi, der blev dannet i kammeret. Mudderet er derfor kun det originale mellemlag, selvom det i dag er det ydre synlige lag. Et dengang ydre lag var overfladesten af limsten som i Giza. Under hele strukturen er der enten som i Giza et kæmpe system af kanaler eller som i Hawara en ligeså stor labyrintisk struktur bestående af 3000 kamre. Pyramiden og labyrinten er ikke et gravkammer eller en underjordisk kirkegård, det er ikke Kongernes Dal 2. Man bliver efterhånden trætte at høre på denne selvoptagede gravrøver-dødskult! Mudderet er isolationsdelen af noget, der foregår indenfor.

Jeg har hørt bekymrede beskrivelser af, hvad man kunne finde i labyrinten. Åh-nej, nu er alle de fine kartoucher ødelagt, ‘The Hall of Records’ er ødelagt, gravstedet for ‘de hellige krokodiller’ (Herodot) er ødelagt. Der er også det nedladende karaktermord: Herodot, historieskrivningens fader (480-423 f.v.t), var ikke meget mere end en omrejsende journalist, der troede på alt, hvad man fortalte ham. Han rejste i de seneste dynastiers periode (Ptolemæerne), og man fortalte også dengang dumme turister, hvad de gerne ville høre. Så Herodot vidste ikke, hvad han talte om, selvom han havde talt med folk, der besad en overleveret viden direkte fra fortiden, men nedladende typer, der udtaler sig 2.500 år senere med ideologisk bias ved alt om det …

Herodot skriver, at det er en labyrint, der er skruet sådan sammen, at man farer vild og ikke kommer ud igen, medmindre man har en guide. Han fik kun adgang til labyrintdelen på den øverste etage, så det berettes ikke, om underetagen / -etagerne også var labyrintiske. Vi husker måske historien om Theseus, der begiver sig ind i Labyrinten på Kreta – der hævdes at være paladset på Knossos, hvilket er lidt besynderligt, hvor skal kongen og hans folk så bo? – for at slå den menneskeædende tyremand ihjel. Og for at finde ud igen, får han den røde tråd af Ariadne, kongens datter, der som man siger: havde et godt øje til ham. En underholdende historie med forgreninger, der ender med, at hans far kong Aegeus i Athen smider sig selv i havet, fordi han tror, at sønnen er død, hvorefter det jo må hedde Det Ægæiske Hav.

Men Herodot var ikke den eneste historiker i antikken, der skrev om labyrinten i Hawwara. Antikkens historikere led altså af kollektive halucinationer.
Den romerske geograf, filosof og historiker Strabo (63 f.v.t – 24) skrev om den.
Den græske historiker bosiddende på Sicilien (90-30 f.v.t) Diodorus Siculus skrev om den. Han skriver, at labyrinten på Kreta var en nedskaleret efterligning af den egyptiske, at den på Kreta selvfølgelig var forsvundet i mellemtiden, men at den egyptiske stadig var fuldstændig intakt – altså indtil man på samme tid lavede en vandingskanal.
Den romerske historiker, naturhistoriker og militærmand Plinius den Ældre (23 f.v.t – 79) skriver om den. Han er ovenikøbet så fræk, at han påstår, den blev bygget over 3.000 år før hans tid, hvilket vil sige i prædynastisk tid! Han må helt bestemt have været på svampe.

En YouTube-historiker ved navn Michael Button har for nylig (2025) lavet en fin dokumentar ved navn:
This Could Be the Greatest Archaeologic Find Ever.
Han slutter med at advokere for en storstilet udgravning af den store labyrint ved siden af pyramiden i Hawwara, Egypten. Den nyeste teknologi har præcist målt enorme strukturer nøjagtigt hvor antikkens historikere sagde, den skulle befinde sig. Hans advokatur, der nærmest er et krav, er fuldstændig rimeligt. Det er indiskutabelt, at noget sådant er vores ret som mennneskehed at kende til at få adgang til. Men hvor rimeligt kravet end er, så er video-historikeren også naiv. Min kommentar til ham var:

It is not going to happen, and I think you know it. We can all agree, that it should happen and nothing else makes sense to normal sound logic inherent to morally responsible people. It is our right as humanity. But this is not the logic of – let’s just say: the special interests, that have had the power to prevent it from happening till today. Whenever you get too close to sites of this kind, we see these prohibitions show up.

There are several places in Egypt alone, where you will see military installations close to historical sites. In Serapeum, Saqqara the hall with the mysterious stone sarcophagi suddenly stops with a piece of clearly man made wall, and on the other side is … a military installation. What kind of military has interests in archaeology, Egyptian national military? Hardly. They are probably following orders and doing the work, but who gives these orders? Zahi Hawass, who’s your daddy? This guy must be one of the worst scoundrels of archaeology ever, but who is he working for? I don’t think, it’s sufficient to point to his huge ego, and no, he is not just a corrupt tomb raider, something else is going on. It seems to be the same story all the time.

The national museum of Baghdad was plundered, when the American military went in, and to this day the loot has not been fully returned.
 A whole city complex of pyramidal structures was found on deep water southwest of Cuba by marine engineer Paulina Zelitsky. Further investigations were shut down, since the military moved in, and you are not allowed to be in the ‘hot zone’.
 The Smithsonian Institute have a bad reputation for making things disappear. They actually lost a case, that went all the way to supreme court on their deliberate destruction of thousands of skeletons of unusual height.
 A whole city the size of Manhattan was found underwater outside the coast of India. Further investigation was shut down by the authorities.
 A very strange site in Paraguay called The Bald Mountain is forbidden military zone.

Archaeologist are attacked and lose their careers, when they come across things, that they in their honest opinion as responsible scientists cannot interpret the way, they are supposed to. Part of the explanation is of course, that it threatens the academic society, if some discovery pulls the carpet under, what is mainstream accepted. There is a lot of backstabbing going on i Academia and a lot of invested interest. Pier reviewing is also pier pressure. But there is more than this, deeper invested interests are at play. There is constantly a sense of ‘a hidden hand’.

You could write a whole book about this subject, but it would be a strange book full of unanswered questions. The Nazi military group under the name Ahnenerbe, the heritage of the ancestors, went all over the world for exactly these types of sites including the one mentioned in Paraguay. You can read more about it in this article: https://www.overetagen.dk/the-vikings/ 
 The Germans tried to drill through the flat top of the mountain with the heaviest pneumatic drill available – and these guys had technology to be reckoned with! – but they could not get through a kind of concrete material harder than anything known to them.

The list is endless, and there is a pattern that cannot be denied. This is not national or governmental military operations but something else. We are forced to speculate due to the amount of secrecy and classification, which unsurprisingly will be labelled ‘conspiracy theories’, which is the psychological teflon shield around those kind of special interests. Why all this military activity in Antarctica? What are the Americans doing in Northern Greenland? They will tell us about strategic importance because of … the Russians, the Chinese, bla-bla. So many questions, so few honest answers.

Museums around the world have closed rooms with artifacts, that are never exhibited due to their strangeness. The Austrian museum inspector Claus Dona managed years ago after years of hard and stubborn efforts to pull an exhibition together i Wienna with those artifacts from all over the world. Michael Cremo wrote a heavy book by the name of Forbidden Archaeology about discoveries of places and things, that totally brake historical chronology.

Some of these anomalies eg. in Egypt are right out there in the open. There was no time to hide it, and now it is too late. In these cases we are always presented with awkward and absurd misinterpretations. This is possible, because egyptologists don’t find it relevant to ask other people about the likelihood of they theories. They don’t consult engineers, geologists, geophysics or anyone in ‘real’ science. Their understanding of the technology it would take and the logistics in order to perform is dysfunctional. And they actually believe their own fairy tales. Years ago I had a 2 years long time collaboration with the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, Center for Ice and Climate. They drilled these kilometer long holes into the ice core of Greenland. This made them able to read the climate year-by-year down in the history of the earth. They were able to see the exact year and down to summer-winter when the major volcano eruptions took place leaving traces around the globe. Egyptology have build it’s dynastic dating around one of these eruptions, and the ice core dates moved it … a couple of thousand years! Do you think, the egyptologists accepted their story being incorrect and the necessity to adjust it. No-no-no, because they don’t listen to hard evidence, they know EVERYTHING themselves.

The most well known story is of course the geologist Robert Schoch’s conclusions of the walls around the sphinx and the erosions, that can only form with rain over long periods of time. And when did it rain that much in Egypt? So: big problem for egyptology, that automatically and stereotypically releases arrogant reactions and denial. Will they unwillingly be forced to listen, when they are bombarded with evidence from the new technologies, that can scan in debth? Or will the special interests – should we maybe call them ‘the archaeology mafia’? – be able to block the fundings, since it is a very expensive project to uncover the Great Labyrinth of Hawwara – that we knew all along was there?

Læs: Et egyptisk-rumænsk rejsebrev